Is it possible to bring peace through dialogue?
This is the question which is worth answering, especially in the current global scenario. Terrorism has emerged as an unsolvable phenomenon, costing heavy budgets to fight against.
Actually there are many mistakes and many mishandlings in the struggle to over come on this phenomenon, which results in rapid increase in such activities.
The basic problem of this mistake is that there is no consensus definition of “terrorism”.
And it seems that it has been left opened to gain some hidden agenda, which has also created doubts about the intentions of fighters against terrorism.
The goal behind this all struggle is to baring peace in world.
What is the statuesque of this struggle? Is it successful to some level? Are the sufferings satisfied from this war on terror?
The answer is absolutely, NO.
Now the question is “CAN WE BRING PEACE THROUGH DIALOGUE?”
I think that, Yes, we can bring peace through dialogue. But the basic condition for this to consider all the parties, included in dialogue, equal.
One might say that how can we consider accused person as equal, but with out that dialogue process will bear no fruits.
Here I m putting some questions if we can answer them it will help improve pace to some level.
- What should be the process for dialogue?
- Who should conduct?
- Who should be the judge?
- What are the basic criteria or definition of peace one should agree on?
Let us answer these questions and play our role to promote peace.
No comments:
Post a Comment